Skip to content Menu

On September 10, 2019, the Department of Education announced its intention to reimburse colleges and universities for the institutional share of Perkins Loan Service Cancellations. The announcement comes amid the wind-down process many institutions are already engaged in following the expiration of the Perkins Loan Program in September of 2017.

ED stated that it will send schools a letter by the end of 2019 with information regarding the amount of reimbursement for cancellations. In addition, this letter will outline the amount and deadline by which institutions must return the federal share. It will also notify schools about the amount and deadline by which to remove and "return" the institutional share of the revolving fund to the school. ED noted that schools should not remove and return any funds until it directs them to do so.

This is a significant development. ED has not reimbursed institutions for cancelled Perkins Loans since FY10, often citing a lack of appropriations. However, per the notice, ED now has determined that it has the authority to reimburse schools even without federal appropriations. Some schools might only receive a partial reimbursement this year, but ED said it anticipates making additional reimbursements in the future.


Bryan Dickson

Assistant Director, Advocacy and Student Financial Services


Related Content

New Borrower Defense Advisory Now Available

New Department of Education borrower defense rules affect both public and private institutions. NACUBO’s guidance explains how to comply with the regulations.

4 Takeaways From the College Board’s New Reports on Pricing and Financial Aid

Annual Trends reports demonstrate higher education’s efforts to address affordability and price sensitivity, with slowing tuition increases and more grant aid from institutions, among other findings.

Court Rules Tuition Payments May Be “Clawed Back” in Bankruptcy

A court of appeals has ruled that tuition payments made by parents in bankruptcy can be recovered by bankruptcy trustees because it found parents receive no “reasonably equivalent value” for the payments.