Skip to content Menu

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) found three key limitations of the composite score the Department of Education uses to assess the financial health of institutions that participate in the federal student aid programs. In report GAO-17-555, published on September 20, the GAO called the score an imprecise risk measure, arguing that it had predicted less than half of school closures since the 2010-11 academic year.

The limitations included:

  • Failure to reflect updates in accounting practices.
  • Use of outdated financial measures rather than new metrics such as liquidity, historical trend analysis, or future projections.
  • Vulnerability to manipulation by allowing schools to inflate their scores by taking out additional debt.

The GAO also criticized ED for inadequately explaining how it calculates schools’ composite scores, noting that administrators at seven out of the 10 schools analysts consulted were confused about their calculations. NACUBO staff met with GAO investigators during their examination and shared concerns about shortcomings in ED’s methodology and application of its rules.

The watchdog agency recommended that ED:

  1. Update the financial composite score to better measure schools’ financial conditions.
  2. Improve its guidance to schools on how it calculates the composite score.
  3. Provide public data on final composite scores for all schools.

In its formal response to the GAO, ED disagreed with the first recommendation even though it is in the process of establishing a negotiated rulemaking committee to update the composite score calculations in light of accounting changes.

Contact

Sue Menditto

Senior Director, Accounting Policy

202.861.2542

Contact

Liz Clark

Vice President, Policy and Research

202.861.2553


Related Content

Income Share Agreement Abstract

Income Share Agreement Program Modeling: Measuring Impact on Yield and Retention

September 17, 2020 | 2-3:15pm ET

FASB’s NAC Discusses HEERF and Revenue Recognition

During a recent meeting, members of FASB’s Not-For-Profit Advisory Committee discussed the conditional nature of CARES Act Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund grants and whether “deemed spent” principles are applicable to HEERF conditions.

NACUBO Student Financial Services Benchmarking Report

The annual Student Financial Services (SFS) Benchmarking Report examines trends in student financial services operations, staffing, and SFS operating budgets at NACUBO member colleges and universities.