Skip to content Menu

The Department of Education has published a series of questions and answers focusing on third-party servicers, clarifying guidance issued in a "Dear Colleague Letter" issued in early 2015.

Third-party servicers are entities or individuals that administer any aspect of an institution's participation in the Title IV programs, including, but not limited to, services and functions necessary:

  • For the institution to remain eligible to participate in the Title IV programs.
  • To determine a student's eligibility for Title IV funds.
  • To account for Title IV funds.
  • To deliver Title IV funds to students.
  • To perform any other aspect of the administration of the Title IV programs.

The Q&A is divided into five sections: third-party servicer definition and examples; contracts; safeguarding student information; third-party servicer data form; and audits.

In its section on definitions and examples, ED clarifies how it defines a third-party servicer and includes a series of tables outlining the various services that institutions outsource to these entities. The tables also include common functions that would not categorize an entity as a third-party servicer.

Most notable to business officers, ED has included "receiving and processing of electronic files to print and mail credit balance refund checks and/or deliver Title IV credit balance refunds to students or parents via ACH" as a service provided by third-party servicers. NACUBO has concern with this inclusion as the association sees banks printing checks as a normal business function. ED has noted, though, that mailing checks produced by the institution does not qualify an entity as a third-party servicer.

Also in the Q&A, ED clarifies that an entity that does not receive compensation or reimbursement, but provides Title IV functions or services on behalf of the institution, is still considered a third-party servicer. ED also reminds institutions that they are required to notify the department when entering into a contract with a third-party servicer.

(Note: this article was updated on September 7 for clarity)


Bryan Dickson

Director, Student Financial Services and Educational Programs



Liz Clark

Vice President, Policy and Research


Related Content

NACUBO Updates Student Agreement Language to Address Assessment of Collection Fees

NACUBO’s updated advisory, Best Practices for Student Financial Responsibility Agreements, includes model language for the agreements and addresses court decisions affecting the ability of an institution to recover costs associated with collections, among other topics of interest to business officers.

ED Shares Details on New Borrower Defense Policy

When considering approved borrower defense to repayment claims, the Department of Education will now apply a presumption of full relief as the starting point and will reduce the amount of relief offered, if warranted, by evidence provided by a school, a borrower, or other sources.

2021 NACUBO Student Financial Services Benchmarking Report Released

New data indicate electronic student payments and credit balance refunds have continued to increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The report also provides benchmarking data on several other measures, including: student account and loan receivables; third-party payments; staffing; and expenditures for student financial services.