Cost of Undergraduate Recruitment at Four-year institutions Has Held Steady Since 2009
January 25, 2012
According to a new report from Noel-Levitz, the median cost to recruit one undergraduate in 2011 (as defined by the budget for undergraduate recruitment and admissions divided by newly enrolled undergraduates) for four-year private institutions was $2,185 – practically the same as the $2,143 spent per undergraduate three years earlier. Public four-year institutions spend a fraction of the cost on student recruitment – only $457 per undergraduate in 2011. Public institutions are also holding their spending on recruitment, if not slightly decreasing it. In 2009, spending per undergraduate was $461. Public two-year institutions’ recruitment spending has actually fallen approximately 59 percent, from $263 in 2009 to $108 in 2011.
Within each of the sectors, enrollment size of the institution played a part in the cost of recruitment. Larger private institutions spend less money than schools with a smaller full-time equivalent (FTE) student body. The same is true within the public institutions.
Private institutions have a higher cost of recruitment per student in part by having a higher staff-to-student ratio. Admissions staff at private institutions reported a median of 33 new undergraduates per FTE admissions employee in 2011. Admissions staff at public institutions have more than three times the amount of new students per staff member at 117, while two-year public institutions have approximately 328 new students per admissions staff.
The Noel-Levitz report, “2011 Cost of Recruiting and Undergraduate Student: Benchmarks for four-year and two-year institutions” is based on data from 236 colleges and universities. Noel-Levitz defines “budget for undergraduate recruitment and admissions” with the following components: all staff salaries and benefits for employees working with undergraduate recruitment or admissions; capital costs; supplies; travel; publications and advertising; consulting services; and vendor/outsourced services. The recruitment budget does not include grants or scholarships.
The report also provides straightforward definitions and calculations so readers can accurately benchmark their institution’s data against the sample in the study. The report can be downloaded for free from the Noel-Levitz site.
Natalie Pullaro Davis
Manager, Research and Policy Analysis
- Some Cash Management Changes Apply to All Institutions
- NACUBO Summarizes Regulations on Banking, Processing Relationships
- Education Funding Depends on Devil in the Details
- 2016 Intermediate Accounting and Reporting - Winter
January 25-26, 2016
- 2016 Facilities and Administrative Rates - Long Form
January 25-26, 2016
- ON-DEMAND: Understanding ED's New Cash Management Rules
- ON-DEMAND: A Financially Sustainable Approach to Innovate Academic Programs
- ON-DEMAND: Legislative Lunchcast: A 30-Minute Washington Update from NACUBO
- ON-DEMAND: Developing Your Campus Distance Learning Strategy
- ON-DEMAND: VIRTUAL: 2015 Annual Meeting
- ON-DEMAND: NACUBO Live!: CBO Speaks
- ON-DEMAND: A Just-in-Time Webcast to Explain FASB’s NFP Reporting Proposal
- ON-DEMAND: Decoding ED's Cash Management Proposal
- A Guide to College and University Budgeting: Foundations for Institutional Effectiveness, 4th ed. - by Larry Goldstein
- NACUBO's Guide to Unitizing Investment Pools - by Mary S. Wheeler
- Managing and Collecting Student Accounts and Loans - by David R. Glezerman and Dennis DeSantis