State Higher Education Appropriations Reflect Recessions
November 14, 2006
Recessions in the national economy between 1979 and 2004 had a ripple effect on state economies, higher education appropriations, and financial access to college, according to the new report "Recession, Retrenchment, and Recovery." Conducted by the Illinois State University Center for the Study of Education Policy, the study on which the report is based analyzed 25 years of trends in state higher education appropriations. In addition, state higher education organizations were surveyed as to how the 2001 recession, which researchers concluded had the most far-reaching impacts, affected higher education appropriations, tuition and fees at public institutions, and need-based student financial aid programs. Interviews were also conducted with government leaders in seven states—Arizona, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Texas, and Washington—to identify policies and strategies that worked in maintaining financial access.
The findings identify the following overall consequences of the recessions for higher education:
- Appropriations by FTE in the U.S. declined by 2 percent following the 1980 recession, 5 percent after the 1990-91 recession, and 8.6 percent after the 2001 recession.
- Appropriations per FTE declined in 26 states following the 1980 recession, in 38 states after the 1990-91 recession, and in 44 states after the 2001 recession.
- The aid-to-tuition ratios declined 17.3 percent after the 1980 recession, 2.3 percent after the 1990-91 recession, and 3.4 percent following the 2001 recession.
The study also suggests that after the 2001 recession state priorities shifted away from higher education and student financial aid to other concerns, such as workforce preparation and economic development. According to responding states, higher education began to be perceived as more of a personal benefit rather than a public contribution. Furthermore, state responses implied that student aid went to traditional college-aged students as opposed to adult learners, with more emphasis placed on merit as a criterion for eligibility.
For further analysis, state strategies, and recommendations, see the full report.
- Some Cash Management Changes Apply to All Institutions
- NACUBO Summarizes Regulations on Banking, Processing Relationships
- Education Funding Depends on Devil in the Details
- 2016 Intermediate Accounting and Reporting - Winter
January 25-26, 2016
- 2016 Facilities and Administrative Rates - Long Form
January 25-26, 2016
- ON-DEMAND: Understanding ED's New Cash Management Rules
- ON-DEMAND: A Financially Sustainable Approach to Innovate Academic Programs
- ON-DEMAND: Legislative Lunchcast: A 30-Minute Washington Update from NACUBO
- ON-DEMAND: Developing Your Campus Distance Learning Strategy
- ON-DEMAND: VIRTUAL: 2015 Annual Meeting
- ON-DEMAND: NACUBO Live!: CBO Speaks
- ON-DEMAND: A Just-in-Time Webcast to Explain FASB’s NFP Reporting Proposal
- ON-DEMAND: Decoding ED's Cash Management Proposal
- A Guide to College and University Budgeting: Foundations for Institutional Effectiveness, 4th ed. - by Larry Goldstein
- NACUBO's Guide to Unitizing Investment Pools - by Mary S. Wheeler
- Managing and Collecting Student Accounts and Loans - by David R. Glezerman and Dennis DeSantis