Public Institutions Should Categorize Pell Grants As Non-operating in IPEDS
February 26, 2009
A continuing controversial topic has been the proper classification of Pell grants by Public Institutions in the "Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Net Assets" (SRECNA). In early 2008 the GASB clarified in its Comprehensive Implementation Guide that Pell Grants are non-exchange and non-operating. As a result, the current Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) Finance Survey contains an edit check to ensure that public institutions report Pell as a Federal non-operating grant.
The IPEDS finance survey is administered by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), which is part of the U.S. Department of Education. Since 2001, when the survey format changed to agree with GASB’s new reporting model, Part B instructions (Revenues and Other Additions) have stated that Pell grants should be included with federal non-operating grants on line 13. According to NCES staff, public institutions tend to report Pell grants somewhere other than nonoperating federal grants. For example, in FY 2006, of the 1,807 public institutions, 1,447 reported nonoperating federal revenues that were less than the Pell grants that were awarded. In fact, 1,193 of these institutions reported nonoperating federal grants as $0.
Although many public institutions have Pell grant amounts that may not significantly affect either the operating or non-operating categories in the SRECNA, the IPEDS Finance Survey edit check will force Pell grants to be classified as non-operating in order to complete and submit the survey. The edit check requires that the amount entered as federal nonoperating grants revenue (Part B, Revenues and Other Additions - line 13, federal nonoperating grants) must be equal to or greater than the amount entered in Part E, "Scholarships and Fellowships," line 1, "Pell Grants." Institutions that enter an amount for Pell Grants that exceeds the amount reported for nonoperating federal grants will receive an edit notice that states, "Pell Grants to students need to be reported as federal nonoperating grants." The error severity is fatal--meaning that it must be corrected for the survey to be submitted.
The accounting and reporting issue raised by Pell grants has three related parts. First is whether the grant is considered an agency or revenue transaction; the second concerns whether such grants are exchange or non-exchange transactions, and the third concerns the classification of Pell grants as operating or non-operating. The controversy that NACUBO, higher education institutions, accounting firms, and GASB have been debating over the years is whether non-exchange transactions are always considered non-operating transactions. Recording Pell grants as non-operating creates a mismatch with the related tuition discount which is reported as operating. Further, there does not appear to be an authoritative rule in the accounting literature that nonexchange always equals nonoperating. A footnote in GASB 24 acknowledges that operating income is not defined in authoritative governmental accounting literature and paragraph 102 of GASB Statement 34 says Governments should establish a policy that defines operating revenues and expenses that is appropriate to the nature of the activity being reported, disclose it in the summary of significant accounting policies, and use it consistently from period to period. The June 30, 2007 edition of GASB’s Comprehensive Implementation Guide answered a question that is currently the most authoritative guidance.
GASB’s Comprehensive Implementation Guide question 7.72.10 asked if public colleges and universities report Pell grants as agency transactions. GASB’s answer clarifies all three related pieces of the issue as follows:
Because of public institutions’ administrative involvement with Pell grant requirements and because Pell grants are non-exchange transactions, public institutions should record Pell grant receipts as nonoperating revenues in their financial statements and any amounts applied to student receivable accounts should be recorded as scholarship discounts or allowances.
The Comprehensive Implementation Guide is issued annually and is considered level D in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Hierarchy. The objective of the guide is to clarify the application of higher level guidance such as accounting standards, pronouncements, technical bulletins, and relevant AICPA literature. Because GASB’s Implementation Guide spelled out that Pell Grants are non-exchange, non-operating revenue transactions, Section 331 of NACUBO’s Financial Accounting and Reporting Manual (FARM) was updated and states that Pell grants are non-operating. FARM is industry guidance and is also level D in the GAAP hierarchy. Although NACUBO continues to discuss this matter with GASB, public institutions need to be aware of explicit statements in both FARM and GASB’s Comprehensive Implementation Guide.
- Affordable Care Act: Final Rules on Coverage for Adjuncts and Students
- Administrative Jobs and Benefits Costs Drive Higher Ed Labor Costs
- OMB Super Circular Makes Changes to Audit Requirements
- 2014 Higher Education Accounting Forum
April 27-29, 2014
- ON-DEMAND: Understanding the Results of the 2013 NACUBO-Commonfund Study of Endowments, and a Look to 2014 and Beyond
- ON-DEMAND: How Behavioral Changes Helped Cut Energy Usage in Half
- ON-DEMAND: Developing a Market-Informed Approach to Tuition Pricing
- ON-DEMAND: Responsibility Center Management: The Process Necessary to Complete a Successful Implementation
- ON-DEMAND: OD: Responsibility Center Management: How Innovations Have Changed the Nature of RCM
- A Guide to College and University Budgeting: Foundations for Institutional Effectiveness, 4th ed. - by Larry Goldstein
- NACUBO's Guide to Unitizing Investment Pools - by Mary S. Wheeler
- Managing and Collecting Student Accounts and Loans - by David R. Glezerman and Dennis DeSantis