ED Releases Financial Responsibility Scores
October 21, 2011
The Department of Education released the FY2009-10 financial responsibility scores for nonprofit and proprietary institutions participating in the Title IV financial aid programs last week. Slightly over 10 percent of degree-granting nonprofit colleges on the list posted composite scores lower than the 1.5 needed to be considered financially responsible under ED rules.
ED’s financial responsibility standards (34 CFR 668.171), promulgated in 1997, rely on three ratios to measure the financial health of an institution. These ratios—primary reserve, equity, and net income—are weighted and combined into a single composite score. The composite score can, by definition, be no lower than -1 and no higher than 3. An institution with a composite score of 1.5 or above is considered fully financially responsible. One with a score between 1.0 and 1.4 is placed in the “zone alternative” and subject to heightened scrutiny. A score below 1.0 means that a school has failed the test and must either provide a letter of credit equal to half of the institution’s previous year’s Title IV expenditures, or provide a letter of credit for 10 percent of its previous year’s funds and accept provisional certification.
The table shows the number of degree-granting nonprofit colleges and universities identified in the ED list with composite scores below 1.5 over the last four years. (Note that, for a variety of reasons, the data is not complete: scores were not posted for all institutions in each year.)
|Below 1.0 (failing)||50||70||81||80|
|Total below 1.5||91||128||151||153|
It comes as no surprise that the downturn in the economy over the last three years has impacted nonprofit college and university scores. The number of institutions with composite scores below 1.5 has increased by more than 60 percent between FY06-07 and FY09-10. However, NACUBO believes that the manner in which ED calculates the ratios has, unfortunately, exacerbated the increase.
NACUBO has raised questions about how ED is calculating the financial responsibility ratios and its treatment of key elements including endowment losses, long-term debt, and pension liabilities. Until recent years, institutions often did not know that the composite score calculated by ED often differed from their own or their auditors’ calculations.
NACUBO has joined a task force convened by the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities for a broader conversation about these standards and their effectiveness as a measure of financial health and the continued viability of institutions. The task force is expected to make recommendations early next year. When the FY09-10 composite scores were released publicly, NAICU issued a statement providing context and cautioning that a failing score does not mean that an institution is in danger of closing.
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Director, Accounting Policy
- College Endowment Average Return Falls to 2.4 Percent in FY15, Endowment Spending Up Sharply
- NACUBO Urges One-Year Postponement of Changes to 1098-T Reporting Requirements
- GASB Addresses Asset Retirement Obligations and Seeks Field Testers
- 2016 Student Financial Services
March 13-15, 2016
- 2016 Higher Education Accounting Forum
April 10-12, 2016
- 2016 CAO and CBO Collaborations
August 1-2, 2016
- WEBCAST: Legislative Lunchcast: A 30-Minute Washington Update from NACUBO
Monday, February 22, 2016 12:00pm ET
- WEBCAST: Responsibility Center Management: Two Different Perspectives
Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:00PM ET
- WEBCAST: Title IX: Key Issues Surrounding Institutional Compliance
Wednesday, April 20, 2016 1:00PM ET
- WEBCAST: The Clery Act: Strategic Planning to Mitigate Institutional Risk
Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:00PM ET
- ON-DEMAND: NACUBO Live! Results of the 2015 NACUBO-Commonfund Study of Endowments
- A Guide to College and University Budgeting: Foundations for Institutional Effectiveness, 4th ed. - by Larry Goldstein
- NACUBO's Guide to Unitizing Investment Pools - by Mary S. Wheeler
- Managing and Collecting Student Accounts and Loans - by David R. Glezerman and Dennis DeSantis