GASB Issues Implementation Guide on Derivative Instruments
April 23, 2009
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has issued its long awaited Guide to Implementation of Statement 53 on Derivative Instruments. The purpose of the guide is to assist preparers in implementing the GASB’s recently issued standard on accounting and financial reporting for derivative instruments. The derivative standard is effective next fiscal year for public institutions.
The guide provides answers to more than 100 questions on topics relating to the implementation of Statement 53, including:
- Scope and applicability of Statement 53 with special emphasis on the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception;
- Definition of derivative instruments focusing on the distinguishing characteristics of a derivative instrument - settlement factors, leverage, and net settlement;
- Embedded derivative instruments, and when an embedded derivative instrument results in a hybrid instrument;
- Hedge effectiveness criteria, and how to apply the methods of evaluating effectiveness - the consistent critical terms, the synthetic instrument, the dollar-offset, and the regression analysis methods;
- Disclosures; and
- Effective date and transition.
In addition to the illustrations that were included in Statement 53, the journal entries that support the transactions in the illustrations have now been added. The GASB Guide to Implementation of Statement 53 on Derivative Instruments is available for order by logging on to www.gasb.org.
Derivative instruments are financial contracts, the values of which are based on the relative worth of their underlying assets. Some common examples of underlying assets are commodities, stocks, commercial real estate loans, residential mortgages, bonds, interest rates, and exchange rates. Derivatives are often used as hedges to reduce financial risks. For example, instruments such as futures, forwards, options and swaps are used to reduce financial risks related to asset and liability values, cash flows (such as interest payments), commodity market fluctuations, or foreign currency vacillation.
In June 2008, the GASB issued GASB Statement No. 53, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments" (SGAS 53). The standard requires derivatives to be measured at fair value. If derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, fair value changes are deferred until termination events specified in the standard are met. Public institutions can use hedge accounting when the derivative instrument effectively reduces the intended risk. There is a requirement to assess the hedge’s effectiveness using methods prescribed in the standard. The standard establishes disclosure requirements such as a derivative summary, information about hedge effectiveness, fair value, management’s objectives, significant terms, and risks.
Because derivatives and hedges have become common, public institutions must pay attention to the standard’s transition and effective dates. Although the standard is effective in FY10, institutions must evaluate their derivative instruments at the end of FY09; the standard would be retroactively applied for hedges deemed effective. Ineffective instruments in FY09 would be subject to a transition adjustment and reported as a restatement of beginning net assets.
Staff Resource: Sue Menditto, director, accounting policy
- IRS Grants Relief from New 1098-T Reporting Mandate
- New Overtime Rule Expected Mid-May
- 1042-S Questions Remain as Scrutiny Intensifies
- 2016 CAO and CBO Collaborations
August 1-2, 2016
- 2016 Planning and Budgeting Forum
September 19-20, 2016
- 2016 Managerial Analysis and Decision Support
November 17-18, 2016
- WEBCAST: The Clery Act: Strategic Planning to Mitigate Institutional Risk
Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:00PM ET
- ON-DEMAND: Title IX: Key Issues Surrounding Institutional Compliance
- ON-DEMAND: Containing Cost and Risk with Renewables – the Power Purchase Agreement Story
- ON-DEMAND: NACUBO Live! Higher Education Accounting Forum
- ON-DEMAND: Are Hedge Funds and Private Equity Right for You? An Analysis of Alternative Investments
- ON-DEMAND: Responsibility Center Management: Two Different Perspectives